正确答案:

题目：请在第____处填上正确选项。

解析：[考点分析] 上下文逻辑关系定位[选项分析] 此题为段首空，其内容由下一句决定。空后说This is a shame，那么此句之前，即空中所填的内容一定是一个让人感觉 shameful的事情。只有F 选项中many social scientists seem reluctant to tackle such problems 是应该羞愧的事情。因此可以确定F 选项为正确答案

查看原题 查看所有试题

学习资料的答案和解析：

[单选题]针对蒋介石“内战、独裁、分裂”的阴谋，中国共产党明确提出了“和平、民主、团结，，三大口号，以代替过去提出的“抗战、团结、进步”三大口号。这一．口号来源于

1945年《对目前时局的宣言》

解析：为建立新中国而奋斗，这是中国人民的根本利益之所在。中国共产党希望通过和平的途径对中国进行政治社会的改革，逐步向新中国这个目标迈进。1945年8月25日，中共中央发表经政治局扩大会议讨论通过的《对目前时局的宣言》，明确提出党的方针是：“在‘和平’、‘民主’、‘团结’的基础上，实现全国的统一，建设独立自由与富强的新中国。”这是中共审时度势，顺应时代的要求，充分表达全国人民的迫切愿望和利益的方针。中共中央派毛泽东、周恩来、王若飞为代表，即赴重庆与国民党方面进行和平谈判，故B正确。

[单选题]在当代中国。坚持发展是硬道理的本质要求是坚持科学发展．科学发展观是我国经济社会发展的重要指导方针。是发展中国特色社会主义必须坚持和贯彻的重大战略思想，是党必须长期坚持的指导思想。提出科学发展观的现实基础是

新世纪新阶段的阶段性特征

解析：科学发展观，是立足社会主义初级阶段基本国情，深入分析我国发展的阶段性特征、总结我国发展实践、准确把握世界发展趋势、借鉴国外发展经验，适应新的发展要求提出来的。我国社会主义初级阶段的基本国情是提出科学发展观的根本依据。新世纪新阶段的阶段性特征是提出科学发展观的现实基础。当代世界的发展实践和发展理念是提出科学发展观的重要借鉴。故C正确。D是邓小平理论形成的历J吏依据。

[多选题]“一个中心、两个基本点”是基本路线最主要的内容，是实现社会主义现代化奋斗目标的基本途径。以下对其内容概括正确的有

“坚持四项基本原则’’回答了解放和发展生产力的政治保证问题，体现了社会主义基本制度的要求

“一个中心、两个基本点，，是一个整体，揭示了中国特色往会主义的客观规律和发展道路

解析：“以经济建设为中心”回答了社会主义的根本任务问题，体现了发展生产力的本质要求。“坚持四项基本原则”回答了解放和发展生产力的政治保证问题，体现了社会主义基本制度的要求。“坚持改革开放”回答了社会主义的发展动力和外部条件问题，体现了解放生产力的本质要求。“一个中心、两个基本点”是一个整体，集中体现了我国社会主义现代化建设的战略布局，揭示了中国特色社会主义的客观规律和发展道路。全面坚持和正确处理“一个中心、两个基本点”的相互关系，是正确认识和处理经济基础与上层建筑之间、生产力与生产关系之间辩证统一关系的内在要求。故BD正确。如果A将“解放生产力”改为“发展生产力”；C将“发展生产力”改为“解放生产力”，那么也正确。

[多选题]抗日民主政府在工作人员分配上实行“三三制”原则。即共产党员、非党的左派进步分子和不左不右的中间派各占1／3。这是抗日民主政府在政权建设方面的一个重要内容-对“三三制”政权性质的表述，正确的有

是共产党领导的抗日民族统一战线性质的政权

是一切赞成抗日又赞成民主的人们的政权

是几个革命阶级联合起来对于汉奸和反动派的民主专政

解析：为了容纳各方面的代表，团结一切赞成抗日又赞成民主的各阶级、阶层，扩大统一战线的力量，抗日民主政府在工作人员分配上实行“三三制”原则。根据地的抗日民主政权，是共产党领导的抗IEl民族统一战线性质的政权，它以工农联盟为基础，是共产党领导的一切赞成抗日又赞成民主的人们的政权，是几个革命阶级联合起来的政权。抗日民主政权普遍采取民主集中制，各级抗日民主政权机构的领导人都经过人民选举产生。BCD正确，A是新民主主义社会的政权性质，不符题意。

[多选题]在共产主义实现的历史必然性中就包含着无产阶级和先进人类对共产主义理想的追求，社会主义代替资本主义和最后实现共产主义的历史进程，离不开

工人阶级及其政党的能动性

社会主义国家建设事业的推进

世界社会主义运动的发展

解析：社会主义代替资本主义和最后实现共产主义的历史进程，离不开工人阶级 及其政党的能动性，离不开社会主义国家建设事业的推进，离不开世界社会主义运动的发展。可以说，在共产主义实现的历史必然性中就包含着无产阶级和先进人类对共产主义理想的追求。

[单选题]The critics think that the new awards will most benefit

the founders of the new awards.

[单选题]To which of the following would the author most probably agree?

Unemployment benefits should not be made conditional.

解析： 细节题。本题题根据选项定位。

[单选题]The White House claims that its power of enforcement

根据以下资料，回答下面的题目。On a five to three vote, the Supreme Court knocked out much of Arizona’s immigration law Monday-a modest policy victory for the Obama Administration.But on the more important matter of the Constitution,the decision was an 8-0 defeat for the Administration’s effort to upset the balance of power between the federal government and the states.In Arizona v.United States, the majority overturned three of the four contested provisions of Arizona’s controversial plan to have state and local police enforce federal immigration law.The Constitutional principles that Washington alone has the power to “establish a uniform Rule of Naturalization ”and that federal laws precede state laws are noncontroversial .Arizona had attempted to fashion state policies that ran parallel to the existing federal ones.Justice Anthony Kennedy, joined by Chief Justice John Roberts and the Court’s liberals, ruled that the state flew too close to the federal sun.On the overturned provisions the majority held the congress had deliberately “occupied the field” and Arizona had thus intruded on the federal’s privileged powers.However,the Justices said that Arizona police would be allowed to verify the legal status of people who come in contact with law enforcement.That’s because Congress has always envisioned joint federal-state immigration enforcement and explicitly encourages state officers to share information and cooperate with federal colleagues.Two of the three objecting Justice-Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas-agreed with this Constitutional logic but disagreed about which Arizona rules conflicted with the federal statute.The only major objection came from Justice Antonin Scalia,who offered an even more robust defense of state privileges going back to the alien and Sedition Acts.The 8-0 objection to President Obama turns on what Justice Samuel Alito describes in his objection as “a shocking assertion assertion of federal executive power”.The White House argued that Arizona’s laws conflicted with its enforcement priorities,even if state laws complied with federal statutes to the letter.In effect, the White House claimed that it could invalidate any otherwise legitimate state law that it disagrees with . Some powers do belong exclusively to the federal government, and control of citizenship and the borders is among them.But if Congress wanted to prevent states from using their own resources to check immigration status, it could.It never did so.The administration was in essence asserting that because it didn’t want to carry out Congress’s immigration wishes, no state should be allowed to do so either. Every Justice rightly rejected this remarkable claim. Three provisions of Arizona’s plan were overturned because they

outweighs that held by the states.

解析：考点分析：此题考查考生对文章细节信息的把握能力选项分析：根据题干中的关键词the White House, 定位在第六段。最后一句提到白宫声称它能够使任何它不同意的州法律不合法，也就是选项A。

[单选题]根据以下资料，回答{TSE}题。On a five to three vote, the Supreme Court knocked out much of Arizona’s immigration law Monday-a modest policy victory for the Obama Administration.But on the more important matter of the Constitution,the decision was an 8-0 defeat for the Administration’s effort to upset the balance of power between the federal government and the states.In Arizona v.United States, the majority overturned three of the four contested provisions of Arizona’s controversial plan to have state and local police enforce federal immigration law.The Constitutional principles that Washington alone has the power to “establish a uniform Rule of Naturalization ”and that federal laws precede state laws are noncontroversial .Arizona had attempted to fashion state policies that ran parallel to the existing federal ones.Justice Anthony Kennedy, joined by Chief Justice John Roberts and the Court’s liberals, ruled that the state flew too close to the federal sun.On the overturned provisions the majority held the congress had deliberately “occupied the field” and Arizona had thus intruded on the federal’s privileged powers.However,the Justices said that Arizona police would be allowed to verify the legal status of people who come in contact with law enforcement.That’s because Congress has always envisioned joint federal-state immigration enforcement and explicitly encourages state officers to share information and cooperate with federal colleagues.Two of the three objecting Justice-Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas-agreed with this Constitutional logic but disagreed about which Arizona rules conflicted with the federal statute.The only major objection came from Justice Antonin Scalia,who offered an even more robust defense of state privileges going back to the alien and Sedition Acts.The 8-0 objection to President Obama turns on what Justice Samuel Alito describes in his objection as “a shocking assertion assertion of federal executive power”.The White House argued that Arizona’s laws conflicted with its enforcement priorities,even if state laws complied with federal statutes to the letter.In effect, the White House claimed that it could invalidate any otherwise legitimate state law that it disagrees with . Some powers do belong exclusively to the federal government, and control of citizenship and the borders is among them.But if Congress wanted to prevent states from using their own resources to check immigration status, it could.It never did so.The administration was in essence asserting that because it didn’t want to carry out Congress’s immigration wishes, no state should be allowed to do so either. Every Justice rightly rejected this remarkable claim. {TS}Three provisions of Arizona’s plan were overturned because they

overstepped the authority of federal immigration law.

解析：考点分析：此题考查考生对文章细节信息的把握能力选项分析：根据题干中的关键词 three provisions of Arizona定位到文中第二段。第一句提到Arizona计划的三个部分被推翻是让州和地方警察实施联邦移民[微博]法律。这句话没有相对应选项，所以看到后面一句，意思是宪法的规则是毋庸置疑的，它认为华盛顿本身就有建立一个统一的自然化的规则的权力，而且认为联邦法律优先于州法律。所以被推翻就是因为它超越了联邦移民法的权威。此题也可在第三段第二句话，因为它提到on the overturned provision, 意思是大部分人认为议会故意占据了领地，Arizona因此侵犯了联邦的享有特权的权力。所以，答案是B