正确答案: C

Content-oriented approach.

题目：Which is NOT included in Approach of Oral English Teaching?

解析：本题考查口语教学。题干：哪一项不是口语教学方式？口语教学方式包括interactive approach“问答式”，class report approach“课堂报告法”和rehearsal approach“复述法”等。C项“重内容的教学模式”属于写作教学模式。故本题选C。

查看原题 查看所有试题

学习资料的答案和解析：

[单选题]"皮格马利翁效应"体现了教师的( )对学生的影响。

期望

解析：罗森塔尔效应也称皮格马利翁效应或期待效应，认为教师的期望或明或暗地被传送给学生，学生会按照教师所期望的方向来塑造自己的行为。故选择C。

[单选题]Passage 2 Scientists have been surprised at how deeply culture-the language we speak, the values we absorb-shapes the brain, and are rethinking findings derived from studies of Westerners. To take one recent example, a region behind the forehead called the medial prefrontal cortex supposedly represents the self: it is active when we ("we" being the Americans in the study) think of our own identity and traits. But with Chinese volunteers, the results were strikingly different. The "me" circuit hummed not only when they thought whether a particular adjective described themselves, but also when they considered whether it described their mother. The Westerners showed no such overlap between self and mom. Depending whether one lives in a culture that views the self as autonomous and unique or as connected to and part of a larger whole, this neural circuit takes on quite different functions. "Cultural neuroscince," as this new field is called, is about discovering such differences. Some of the findings, as with the "me/mom" circuit, buttress longstanding notions of cultural differences.For instance, it is a cultural cliche that Westerners focus on individual objects while East Asians pay attention to context and background (another manifestation of the individualism-collectivism split). Sure enough, when shown complex, busy scenes, Asian-Americans and non-Asian-Americans recruited different brain regions. The Asians showed more activity in areas that process figure-ground relations-holistic context-while the Americans showed more activity in regions that recognize objects. Psychologist Nalini Ambady of Tufts found something similar when she and colleagues showed drawings of people in a submissive pose (head down, shoulders hunched) or a dominant one (arms crossed, face forward) to Japanese and Americans. The brain's dopamine-fueled reward circuit became most active at the sight of the stance-dominant for Americans, submissive for Japanese-that each volunteer's culture most values, they reported in 2009. This raises an obvious chicken-and-egg question, but the smart money is on culture shaping the brain, not vice versa. Cultural neuroscience wouldn't be making waves if it found neurobiological bases only for well-known cultural differences. It is also uncovering the unexpected. For instance, a 2006 study found that native Chinese speakers use a different region of the brain to do simple arithmetic (3+4) or decide which number is larger than native English speakers do, even though both use Arabic numerals. The Chinese use the circuits that process visual and spatial information and plan movements (the latter may be related to the use of the abacus). But English speakers use language circuits. It is as if the West conceives numbers as just words, but the East imbues them with symbolic, spatial freight. (Insert cliche about Asian math geniuses) "One would think that neural processes involving basic mathematical computations are universal:' says Ambady, but they "seem to be culture-specific." Not to be the skunk at this party, but I think it's important to ask whether neuroscience reveals anything more than we already know from, say, anthropology. For instance, it's well known that East Asian cultures prize the collective over the individual, and that Americans do the opposite. Does identifying brain correlates of those values offer any extra insight? After all, it's not as if anyone thought those values are the result of something in the liver. Ambady thinks cultural neuro-science does advance understanding. Take the me/mom finding, which, she argues, "attests to the strength of the overlap between self and people close to you in collectivistic cultures and the separation in individualistic cultures. It is important to push the analysis to the level of the brain." Especially when it shows how fundamental cultural differences are-so fundamental, perhaps, that "universal" notions such as human rights, democracy, and the like may be no such thing.

Which of the following may best describe the author 's attitude towards universal cultural concepts in the last paragraph?

Positive

解析：由最后一段尤其是最后一句中Bgthat'universal' notions such as human rights, democracy, and the like may be no such thing”可知.作者对普遍的文化概念是持积极态度的。故选择B。

[多选题]青少年心理健康的标准有哪些？（10分）

[单选题]当一位新入职的老师向经验丰富的张老师借教案上课时，张老师拒绝了，说道："我的教案不一定适合你，这个周末我们一起来探讨。"这表明张老师()。

注重帮助同事的方法

解析：《中小学教师职业道德规范》（1997年修订）"团结协作"规定，教师要谦虚谨慎、尊重同志，相互学习、相互帮助，维护其他教师在学生中的威信。教师要积极配合其他教师的教学，从而使各学科、各年级的教学有机融合、相互促进。故选择A。

[单选题]Which of the following statements is NOT the features of spoken language?

It is generally produced in complicated sentence structures.

解析：考查英语口语特点。口语交流一般以简单的单词、短句和简单的句子结构为主，有时表达的句子结构不完整但意思明确。

[单选题]学生认识客观世界的基本途径是( )。

学习间接经验

解析：学生以学习间接经验为主，学习间接经验是学生认识客观世界的基本途径。故选择D。

[单选题]下列学习策略中，不属于资源管理策略的是( )。

调节策略

解析：资源管理策略包括时间管理策略、努力管理策略、环境管理策略、资源利用策略。调节策略属于元认知策略。