正确答案: D

只去杭州

题目：国庆黄金周，小白和朋友们商量去外地旅游的事，小米说：如果不去绍兴，就去杭州吧。小黄说：如果不去杭州，就不去绍兴了。小刘说：咱们只去其中一处吧。小白据此提出的大家都能接受的意见是( )。

解析：由于小白的意见大家都可以接受，且小刘说只能去一处，因此排除A、B。根据小黄是说法，不去杭州，就不去绍兴，可以推导出去绍兴，就要去杭州，因此如果去绍兴，与小刘说法一一只去其中的一处矛盾，因此选择D。

查看原题 查看所有试题

学习资料的答案和解析：

[单选题]人民教师职业道德规范的核心是()。

热爱学生

解析：热爱学生是教师忠诚于人民教育事业的具体表现，是教师职业道德规范的核心。热爱学生要求教师做到关心爱护全体学生，尊重学生人格，平等公正对待学生。对学生严慈相济，做学生良师益友。保护学生安全，关心学生健康，维护学生权益。不讽刺、挖苦、歧视学生，不体罚或变相体罚学生。故选择A。B选项，为人师表是指教师用自己的言行做出榜样成为学生学习效法的楷模和表率。即做到"学为人师，行为示范"。为人师表是教师职业道德区别于其他职业道德的显著标志，是对教师的特殊规范，它有自己独具的特征。C选项，忠于人民的教育事业要做到，依法执教，严谨治教；爱岗敬业，廉洁从教。D选项，教师团结协作的要求有严于律己，以诚待人。这是团结协作的前提和基础；做到谦虚为怀，有自知之明。

[单选题]把实物、教具展示给学生观察，或通过示范性实验来说明和印证学生掌握的知识的方法称为( )。

演示法

解析：演示法是指教师通过展示实物、教具和示范性的实验来说明、印证某一事物和现象，使学生掌握新知识的一种教学方法。

[单选题]开设专门的道德课程是加强学校德育最有效的途径。( )A.正确B.错误

解析：教学是学校的中心工作，在学校全部工作中所占时间最多，而学生在学校的主要活动是学习，所以开设专门的道德课程是对学生进行德育工作最基本、最经常、最有效的途径。

[单选题]Passage 2 Scientists have been surprised at how deeply culture-the language we speak, the values we absorb-shapes the brain, and are rethinking findings derived from studies of Westerners. To take one recent example, a region behind the forehead called the medial prefrontal cortex supposedly represents the self: it is active when we ("we" being the Americans in the study) think of our own identity and traits. But with Chinese volunteers, the results were strikingly different. The "me" circuit hummed not only when they thought whether a particular adjective described themselves, but also when they considered whether it described their mother. The Westerners showed no such overlap between self and mom. Depending whether one lives in a culture that views the self as autonomous and unique or as connected to and part of a larger whole, this neural circuit takes on quite different functions. "Cultural neuroscince," as this new field is called, is about discovering such differences. Some of the findings, as with the "me/mom" circuit, buttress longstanding notions of cultural differences.For instance, it is a cultural cliche that Westerners focus on individual objects while East Asians pay attention to context and background (another manifestation of the individualism-collectivism split). Sure enough, when shown complex, busy scenes, Asian-Americans and non-Asian-Americans recruited different brain regions. The Asians showed more activity in areas that process figure-ground relations-holistic context-while the Americans showed more activity in regions that recognize objects. Psychologist Nalini Ambady of Tufts found something similar when she and colleagues showed drawings of people in a submissive pose (head down, shoulders hunched) or a dominant one (arms crossed, face forward) to Japanese and Americans. The brain's dopamine-fueled reward circuit became most active at the sight of the stance-dominant for Americans, submissive for Japanese-that each volunteer's culture most values, they reported in 2009. This raises an obvious chicken-and-egg question, but the smart money is on culture shaping the brain, not vice versa. Cultural neuroscience wouldn't be making waves if it found neurobiological bases only for well-known cultural differences. It is also uncovering the unexpected. For instance, a 2006 study found that native Chinese speakers use a different region of the brain to do simple arithmetic (3+4) or decide which number is larger than native English speakers do, even though both use Arabic numerals. The Chinese use the circuits that process visual and spatial information and plan movements (the latter may be related to the use of the abacus). But English speakers use language circuits. It is as if the West conceives numbers as just words, but the East imbues them with symbolic, spatial freight. (Insert cliche about Asian math geniuses) "One would think that neural processes involving basic mathematical computations are universal:' says Ambady, but they "seem to be culture-specific." Not to be the skunk at this party, but I think it's important to ask whether neuroscience reveals anything more than we already know from, say, anthropology. For instance, it's well known that East Asian cultures prize the collective over the individual, and that Americans do the opposite. Does identifying brain correlates of those values offer any extra insight? After all, it's not as if anyone thought those values are the result of something in the liver. Ambady thinks cultural neuro-science does advance understanding. Take the me/mom finding, which, she argues, "attests to the strength of the overlap between self and people close to you in collectivistic cultures and the separation in individualistic cultures. It is important to push the analysis to the level of the brain." Especially when it shows how fundamental cultural differences are-so fundamental, perhaps, that "universal" notions such as human rights, democracy, and the like may be no such thing.

Which of the following is closest in meaning to the underlined phrase "making waves" in Paragraph 3?

Causing disagreement

解析：本题考查词义猜测由画线词定位至文章第三段，画线部分句子的意思是“如果发现神经生物学仅以著名的文化差异为基础，那么文化神经科学并不会掀起风波”。making waves意为“造成轰动，引起话题”，四个选项中D项“引起分歧”意思最接近。综上，D选项正确。故选择D。猜测词义题

[单选题]________ stage for teaching writing is a process in which students should revise and polish their writing by themselves or with peers, ranging from wording, spelling, punctuation to sentence structure and paragraph structure, etc.

Post-writing

解析：考查写作教学过程。写后阶段学生应当自己或与同学一起对初稿进行修改和润色，检查单词拼写、标点、句法结构和段落结构等。

[单选题] After the violent earthquake that shook Los Angeles in 1994, earthquake scientists had good news to report: The damage and death toll could have been much worse. More than 60 people died in this earthquake. By comparison, an earthquake of similar intensity that shook America in 1988 claimed 25,000 victims. Injuries and deaths were relatively less in Los Angeles because the quake occurred at 4:31 am on a holiday, when traffic was light on the city's highways. In addition, changes made to the construction codes in Los Angeles during the last 20 years have strengthened the city's buildings and highways, making them more resistant to quakes. Despite the good news, civil engineers aren't resting on their successes. Pinned to their drawing boards are blueprints for improved quake resistant buildings. The new designs should offer even greater security to cities where earthquakes often take place. In the past, making structures quake-resistant meant firm yet flexible materials, such as steel and wood, that bend without breaking. Later, people tried to lift a building off its foundation, and insert rubber and steel between the building and its foundation to reduce the impact of ground vibrations, The most recent designs give buildings brains as well as concrete and steel supports. Called smart buildings, the structures respond like living organisms to an earthquake's vibrations. When the ground shakes and the building tips forward, the computer would force the building to shift in the opposite direction. The new smart structures could be very expensive to build. However, they would save many lives and would be less likely to be damaged during earthquakes.

The function of the computer mentioned in the Passage is to

counter-balance an earthquake-'s action on the building

解析：1.细节题。根据短文第三段第二句“…changes made to the construction codes in Los Angeles during the last 20 years have strengthened the city's buildings and highways, making them more resistant to quakes.”可知是因为建筑法规在20年内的改变，使地震中的伤亡人数相对不高。故选项D正确。 2.细节题。根据短文第五段最后一句“When the ground shakes and the building tips forward，the computer would force the building to shift in the opposite direction.”可知当地面晃动，建筑物向前倾斜时，电脑会迫使它向相反的方向改变，从而保持平衡。故选项A正确。 3.细节题。文章最后一段指出“The new smart structures could be very expensive to build. However，they would save many lives and would be less likely to be damaged during earthquakes.”可知这种新型的智能结构虽然昂贵但是很值得建造。选项A、C文中没有提到，选项D的表述与原文不一致．故选项B正确。 4.推断题。根据短文第五段可知，过去人们认为建筑材料对减少地震损失很重要，但那是以前的方法，排除选项A、B。而现在重点强调的办法是减少地面震动。选项D文章没有提及，故选C。 5.主旨题。纵观短文可看出作者是通过描述发生在洛杉矶的地震来指出抗震技术的提高。选项A是说地震结果的比较，不是文章重点，选项B、C与原文表述不符，故选项D正确。