• [单选题]毛泽东把经过长期武装斗争,先占乡村,后取城市.最后夺取全国胜利,作为革命道路确立下来的文章是
  • 正确答案 :D
  • 《战争和战略问题》

  • 解析:红军长征到达陕北后,毛泽东进一步丰富了农村包围城市的整体战略思想。1938年11月,他在《战争和战略问题》中明确指出:“共产党的任务,基本地不是经过长期合法斗争以进入起义和战争,也不是先占城市后取乡村,而是走相反的道路。”从此把经过长期武装斗争,先占乡村,后取城市,最后夺取全国胜利,作为革命道路确立下来。D正确。1928年10月和11月,毛泽东在《中国的红色政权为什么能够存在?》和《井冈山的斗争》等文章中,提出了“工农武装割据”的思想,为农村包围城市道路理论的形成奠定了基础。1930年在《星星之火,可以燎原》这篇文章初步形成了以乡村为中心、先在农村建立和发展红色政权,待条件成熟时再夺取全国政权的思想。故ABC不符合题意。

  • [单选题]针对蒋介石“内战、独裁、分裂”的阴谋,中国共产党明确提出了“和平、民主、团结,,三大口号,以代替过去提出的“抗战、团结、进步”三大口号。这一.口号来源于
  • 正确答案 :B
  • 1945年《对目前时局的宣言》

  • 解析:为建立新中国而奋斗,这是中国人民的根本利益之所在。中国共产党希望通过和平的途径对中国进行政治社会的改革,逐步向新中国这个目标迈进。1945年8月25日,中共中央发表经政治局扩大会议讨论通过的《对目前时局的宣言》,明确提出党的方针是:“在‘和平’、‘民主’、‘团结’的基础上,实现全国的统一,建设独立自由与富强的新中国。”这是中共审时度势,顺应时代的要求,充分表达全国人民的迫切愿望和利益的方针。中共中央派毛泽东、周恩来、王若飞为代表,即赴重庆与国民党方面进行和平谈判,故B正确。

  • [多选题]作家史铁生在《奶奶的星星》中讲道,奶奶告诉他的故事与通常的说法不同:一般人说,地上死一个人,天上就熄灭了一颗星星;而奶奶说,地上死一个人,天上又多了一个星星,人死了就会升到天空,变成星星给走夜道的人照个亮了。于是他“慢慢相信,每一个活过的人,都能给后人的路途上添些光亮,也许是一颗巨星,也许是一把火炬,也许只是一支含泪的烛光……”这对我们理解个人在社会历史的作用的启示有
  • 正确答案 :AD
  • 历史是无数个人相互作用的合力的结果

    每个人对社会发展都有或大或小的作用

  • 解析:AD(历史是无数个人相互作用的合理的结果;每个人对社会法治都有或大或小的作用)

  • [多选题]应中国总理李克强的邀请,俄罗斯总理梅德韦杰夫、印度总理辛格和蒙古国总理阿勒坦呼亚格于2013年10月22日开始分别对中国进行正式访问。来自中国三个陆上邻国的领导人,在同一天开启中国之行,这样密集的双边访问在中国外交史上实属罕见。这一外交动向
  • 正确答案 :ACD
  • 体现了中国经济发展的吸引力

    反映了中国周边外交行动的延续和加速

    顺应了互利共赢的时代潮流

  • 解析:ACD(体现了中国经济发展的吸引力;反映了中国周边外交行动的延续和加速、顺应了互利共赢的时代潮流)

  • [多选题]群众观点是无产阶级政党的根本观点。其基本内容是:一切为了群众一切依靠群众。从群众中来,到群众中去。群众路线是无产阶级政党的根本路线。也是党的根本领导方法和工作方法。其哲学依据有
  • 正确答案 :CD
  • 认识论关于实践——认识——实践的原理

    唯物史观关于人民群众是历史创造者的原理

  • 解析:唯物史观关于人民群众是历史创造者的原理,是无产阶级政党的群众观点和群众路线的理论基础。从群众中来,到群众中去,体现了认识论关于实践一认识一实践的原理。所以,正确答案是CD;AB题干体现不出。

  • [多选题]展望未来社会,是否坚持科学的立场、观点和方法是马克思主义与空想杜会主义的根本区别,在于
  • 正确答案 :ABC
  • 在揭示人类社会发展一般规律的基础上指明社会发展的方向

    在剖析资本主义社会旧世界中阐发未来新世界的特点

    立足于揭示未来社会的一般特征,而不作详尽的细节描绘

  • 解析:展望未来社会,是否坚持科学的立场、观点和方法是马克思主义与空想社会主义的根本区别:第一,在揭示人类社会发展一般规律的基础上指明社会发展的方向。第二,在剖析资本主义社会旧世界中阐发未来新世界的特点。第三,立足于揭示未来社会的一般特征,而不作详尽的细节描绘。所以,正确答案是ABC,而D说法不对,因为马克思主义不可能揭示了社会主义的具体实现途径和方式。

  • [单选题]What prompted the chancellor to develop his scheme?
  • 正确答案 :D
  • A passion to ensure fairness for taxpayers.

  • 解析:是什么促使总理制定他的计划?希望所有的人有更美好的生活。 

  • [单选题]What can be learned from the last paragraph?
  • 根据以下资料,回答下面的题目。On a five to three vote, the Supreme Court knocked out much of Arizona’s immigration law Monday-a modest policy victory for the Obama Administration.But on the more important matter of the Constitution,the decision was an 8-0 defeat for the Administration’s effort to upset the balance of power between the federal government and the states.In Arizona v.United States, the majority overturned three of the four contested provisions of Arizona’s controversial plan to have state and local police enforce federal immigration law.The Constitutional principles that Washington alone has the power to “establish a uniform Rule of Naturalization ”and that federal laws precede state laws are noncontroversial .Arizona had attempted to fashion state policies that ran parallel to the existing federal ones.Justice Anthony Kennedy, joined by Chief Justice John Roberts and the Court’s liberals, ruled that the state flew too close to the federal sun.On the overturned provisions the majority held the congress had deliberately “occupied the field” and Arizona had thus intruded on the federal’s privileged powers.However,the Justices said that Arizona police would be allowed to verify the legal status of people who come in contact with law enforcement.That’s because Congress has always envisioned joint federal-state immigration enforcement and explicitly encourages state officers to share information and cooperate with federal colleagues.Two of the three objecting Justice-Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas-agreed with this Constitutional logic but disagreed about which Arizona rules conflicted with the federal statute.The only major objection came from Justice Antonin Scalia,who offered an even more robust defense of state privileges going back to the alien and Sedition Acts.The 8-0 objection to President Obama turns on what Justice Samuel Alito describes in his objection as “a shocking assertion assertion of federal executive power”.The White House argued that Arizona’s laws conflicted with its enforcement priorities,even if state laws complied with federal statutes to the letter.In effect, the White House claimed that it could invalidate any otherwise legitimate state law that it disagrees with . Some powers do belong exclusively to the federal government, and control of citizenship and the borders is among them.But if Congress wanted to prevent states from using their own resources to check immigration status, it could.It never did so.The administration was in essence asserting that because it didn’t want to carry out Congress’s immigration wishes, no state should be allowed to do so either. Every Justice rightly rejected this remarkable claim. Three provisions of Arizona’s plan were overturned because they

  • 正确答案 :B
  • Justices intended to check the power of the Administrstion.

  • 解析:考点分析:此题考查考生对文章主旨的把握能力选项分析:根据前三段得出文章的主旨和移民法律有关,只有A和D提到,答案在其中之一。而A是说通常被议会决定,和本段第三段句话内容冲突。所以答案是D。

  • [单选题]根据以下资料,回答{TSE}题。In the 2006 film version of The Devil Wears Prada, Miranda Priestly, played by Meryl Streep, scold her unattractive assistant for imagining that high fashion doesn’t affect her.Priestly explains how the deep blue color of the assistant’s sweater descended over the years from fashion shows to department stores and to the bargain bin in which the poor girl doubtless found her garment.This top-down conception of the fashion business couldn’t be more out of date or at odds with feverish world described in Overdressed, Elizabeth Cline’s three-year indictment of “fast fashion”.In the last decades or so, advances in technology have allowed mass-market labels such as Zara, H&M, and Uniqlo to react to trends more quickly and anticipate demand more precisely.Quckier turnrounds mean less wasted inventory, more frequent releases, and more profit.Those labels encourage style-conscious consumers to see clothes as disposal—— meant to last only a wash or two, although they don’t advertise that——and to renew their wardrobe every few weeks.By offering on-trend items at dirt-cheap prices, Cline argues, these brands have hijacked fashion cycles, shaking all industry long accustomed to a seasonal pace.The victims of this revolution, of course, are not limited to designers.For H&M to offer a 5.95 knit miniskirt in all its 2300-plus stores around the world, it must rely on low-wage, overseas labor, order in volumes that strain natural resources, and use massive amount of harmful chemicals.Overdressed is the fashion world’s answer to consumer activist bestsellers like Michael Pollan’s The Omnivore’s Dilemma.Mass-produced clothing, like fast food, fills a hunger and need, yet is non-durable, and wasteful,” Cline argues, Americans, she finds, buy roughly 20 billion garments a year——about 64 items per person——and no matter how much they give away, this excess leads to waste.Towards the end of Overdressed, Cline introduced her ideal, a Brooklyn woman named SKB, who, since 2008 has make all of her own clothes——and beautifully.But as Cline is the first to note, it took Beaumont decades to perfect her craft; her example, can’t be knocked off.Though several fast-fashion companies have made efforts to curb their impact on labor and the environment——including H&M, with its green Conscious Collection Line——Cline believes lasting-change can only be effected by the customer.She exhibits the idealism common to many advocates of sustainability, be it in food or in energy.Vanity is a constant; people will only start shopping more sustainably when they can’t afford to it.{TS}Priestly criticizes her assistant for her
  • 正确答案 :B
  • insensitivity to fashion.


  • [单选题]What is the subject of the text?
  • 根据以下资料,回答下面的题目。In the 2006 film version of The Devil Wears Prada, Miranda Priestly, played by Meryl Streep, scold her unattractive assistant for imagining that high fashion doesn’t affect her.Priestly explains how the deep blue color of the assistant’s sweater descended over the years from fashion shows to department stores and to the bargain bin in which the poor girl doubtless found her garment.This top-down conception of the fashion business couldn’t be more out of date or at odds with feverish world described in Overdressed, Elizabeth Cline’s three-year indictment of “fast fashion”.In the last decades or so, advances in technology have allowed mass-market labels such as Zara, H&M, and Uniqlo to react to trends more quickly and anticipate demand more precisely.Quckier turnrounds mean less wasted inventory, more frequent releases, and more profit.Those labels encourage style-conscious consumers to see clothes as disposal—— meant to last only a wash or two, although they don’t advertise that——and to renew their wardrobe every few weeks.By offering on-trend items at dirt-cheap prices, Cline argues, these brands have hijacked fashion cycles, shaking all industry long accustomed to a seasonal pace.The victims of this revolution, of course, are not limited to designers.For H&M to offer a 5.95 knit miniskirt in all its 2300-plus stores around the world, it must rely on low-wage, overseas labor, order in volumes that strain natural resources, and use massive amount of harmful chemicals.Overdressed is the fashion world’s answer to consumer activist bestsellers like Michael Pollan’s The Omnivore’s Dilemma.Mass-produced clothing, like fast food, fills a hunger and need, yet is non-durable, and wasteful,” Cline argues, Americans, she finds, buy roughly 20 billion garments a year——about 64 items per person——and no matter how much they give away, this excess leads to waste.Towards the end of Overdressed, Cline introduced her ideal, a Brooklyn woman named SKB, who, since 2008 has make all of her own clothes——and beautifully.But as Cline is the first to note, it took Beaumont decades to perfect her craft; her example, can’t be knocked off.Though several fast-fashion companies have made efforts to curb their impact on labor and the environment——including H&M, with its green Conscious Collection Line——Cline believes lasting-change can only be effected by the customer.She exhibits the idealism common to many advocates of sustainability, be it in food or in energy.Vanity is a constant; people will only start shopping more sustainably when they can’t afford to it.Priestly criticizes her assistant for her

  • 正确答案 :D
  • Exposure of a mass-market secret.


  • 查看原题 查看所有试题


    推荐科目: 考研 高考 自考 成考
    @2019-2025 必典考网 www.51bdks.net 蜀ICP备2021000628号 川公网安备 51012202001360号