正确答案: D

勒令退学

题目：侮辱、殴打教师，根据情形不同，以下说法不正确的是( )。

解析：《中华人民共和国教师法》第三十五条规定：侮辱、殴打教师的，根据不同情况，分别给予行政处分或者行政处罚；造成损害的，责令赔偿损失；情节严重，构成犯罪的，依法追究刑事责任。故选择D。

查看原题 查看所有试题

学习资料的答案和解析：

[单选题]学生利用头脑中的概念、理论知识来解决问题，这种思维是( ).

逻辑思维

解析：抽象逻辑思维是指在思维过程中以概念、判断、推理的形式来反映事物本质属性和内在规律的思维。概念是这类思维的支柱。故选择C。A选项，直观动作思维又称为实践思维，是指在思维过程中要以具体、实际动作作为支柱而进行的思维，这种思维所要解决的任务目标一般总是直观的、具体的。B选项，具体形象思维是指在思维过程中借助于表象而进行的思维。表象是这类思维的支柱。D选项，发散思维也叫求异思维、分散思维，是指人们解决问题时，思路向各种可能的方向扩散，从而求得多种答案。这一过程是从给予的信息中产生多种信息的过程，因为发散思维使思考者不拘泥于一个途径、一个方法。

[单选题]所谓( )是人们在相互交往中，由个人的好恶、兴趣自发组织起来的群体，具有强烈的感情色彩。

非正式群体

解析：根据群体的构成原则可以划分为正式群体和非正式群体。正式群体是由正式文件明文规定而构成的群体，其成员有固定的编制、明确的权利、义务和职责分工。非正式群体没有正式文件规定而构成的群体，其成员以某种共同利益、观点、爱好为基础，以感情为纽带。依据群体成员相互关系的程度和发展水平可以划分为松散群体、联合群体和集体。松散群体是低层次的，是人们由于时间和空间上的接近而结成的集合体。比如，在同一辆客车上的旅客。联合群体是中间层次，其特点是成员之间存在着共同的目标、共同的利益和共同的活动目的，群体成员之间建立有公务和个人间的接触，共同的活动较多，因而发展为联合群体。集体是群体发展的高级阶段，是为了实现有公益价值的社会目标，严密组织起来的有纪律、有心理凝聚力的群体。根据定义特点，本题答案应选A。

[多选题]简述活动课程的特点。

[单选题]请阅读 Passage 1,完成1~5小题。 　　Passage 1 　　When the Viaduct de Millau opened in the south of France in 2004,this tallest bridge in the world won worldwide accolades.German newspapers described how it "fioated above the clouds" with "elegance and lightness" and "breathtaking" beauty.In France,papers praised the "immense" "concrete giant".Was it mere coincidence that the Germans saw beauty where the French saw heft and power? Lera Borodisky thinks not. 　　In a series of clever experiments guided by pointed questions,Boroditsky is amassing evidence that,yes,language shapes thought.The effect is powerful enough,she says,that "the private mental lives of speakers of different languages may differ dramatically" ,not only when they are thinking in order to speak,"but in all manner of cognitive tasks" ,including basic sensory perception."Even a small fluke of grammar" -the gender of nouns- "can have an effect on how people think about things in the world." she says. 　　As in that bridge,in German,the noun for bridge,Brucke,is feminine.In French,pont is masculine.German speakers saw prototypically female features; French speakers,masculine ones. Similarly,Germans describe keys (Schlussel) with words such as harD.heavy,jaggeD.and metal,while to Spaniards keys (llaves) are golden,intricate,little,and lovely.Guess which language construes key as masculine and which as feminine? Grammatical gender also shapes how we construe abstractions.In 85 percent of artistic depictions of death and victory,for instance,the idea is represented by a man if the noun is masculine and a woman if it is feminine,says Boroditsky. Germans tend to paint death as male,and Russians tend to paint it as female. 　　Language even shapes what we see.People have a better memory for colors if different shades have distinct names-not English's light blue and dark blue,for instance,but Russian's goluboy and sinly.Skeptics of the language-shapes-thought claim have argued that that's a trivial finding, showing only that people remember what they saw in both a visual form and a verbal one,but not proving that they actually see the hues differently.In an ingenious experiment,however,Boroditsky and colleagues showed volunteers three color swatches and asked them which of the bottom two was the same as the top one.Native Russian speakers were faster than English speakers when the colors had distinct names,suggesting that having a name for something allows you to perceive it more sharply.Similarly,Korean uses one word for "in" when one object is in another snugly,and a different one when an object is in something loosely.Sure enough,Korean adults are better than English speakers at distinguishing tight fit from loose fit. 　　Science has only scratched the surface of how language affects thought.In Russian,verb forms indicate whether the action was completed or not-as in "she ate ［and finished］the pizza" .In Turkish,verbs indicate whether the action was observed or merely rumored.Boroditsky would love to run an experiment testing whether native Russian speakers are better than others at noticing if an action is completed.and if Turks have a heightened sensitivity to fact versus hearsay.Similarly,while English says "she broke the bowl" even if it smashed accidentally,Spanish and Japanese describe the same event more like "the bowl broke itself" ."When we show people video of the same event," says Boroditsky,"English speakers remember who was to blame even in an accident,but Spanish and Japanese speakers remember it less well than they do intentional actions.It raises questions about whether language affects even something as basic as how we construct our ideas of causality."

What can be inferred from PARAGRAPH TWO?

The language we speak determines how we think and see the world.

解析：推断题。A项指语言对于塑造思想没有重大影响。B项指语言和思想的关系是由来已久的问题。C项指我们所使用的语言决定着我们如何思考，如何看待这个世界。D项指语言是否塑造思想需要被事实经验证实。从第二段中的“Boroditsky is amassing evidence that,yes，language shapes thought.”和引号包含的话可知C项正确。