正确答案:

题目：正确答案是_______.

查看原题 查看所有试题

学习资料的答案和解析：

[多选题]作家史铁生在《奶奶的星星》中讲道，奶奶告诉他的故事与通常的说法不同：一般人说，地上死一个人，天上就熄灭了一颗星星；而奶奶说，地上死一个人，天上又多了一个星星，人死了就会升到天空，变成星星给走夜道的人照个亮了。于是他“慢慢相信，每一个活过的人，都能给后人的路途上添些光亮，也许是一颗巨星，也许是一把火炬，也许只是一支含泪的烛光……”这对我们理解个人在社会历史的作用的启示有

历史是无数个人相互作用的合力的结果

每个人对社会发展都有或大或小的作用

解析：AD（历史是无数个人相互作用的合理的结果；每个人对社会法治都有或大或小的作用）

[单选题]一位机械工程专家讲过这样一件事："文革"中，他在某地劳动，有一天公社派他去割羊草。他没养过羊，怎么认得羊草呢?但终于一个办法出来了。他把羊牵出去，看羊吃什么就割什么。不到半天就割回了羊草。这位专家之所以这样做是因为他认识到，"羊吃草"与"割羊草"两者之间存在着（　　）

本质联系

解析：本题考点：联系。 该题是考查唯物辩证法的联系观。"羊吃草"与"割羊草"之间的关系不是因果联系，因为"羊吃草"不必然引起"割羊草"，AB错误;C选项表述错误，联系是客观的;看羊吃什么就割什么，这体现的就是本质联系，选D，主要在于“羊吃草"不必然引起"割羊草”这一点。的确，在其他环境下，这的确没有必然联系，但是本题就是一上来就给定了一个这样的大环境，这个人要去割羊草，但是它不知道什么是羊草，所以就牵一头羊出来，看羊吃什么草，他就割什么草。他为什么割这种草，因为羊吃这种草，所以是因果联系。

[单选题]正确答案是_______.

[单选题]To which of the following would the author most probably agree?

Unemployment benefits should not be made conditional.

解析： 细节题。本题题根据选项定位。

[单选题]请在第__6__处填上正确答案。

turns

[单选题]The White House claims that its power of enforcement

根据以下资料，回答下面的题目。On a five to three vote, the Supreme Court knocked out much of Arizona’s immigration law Monday-a modest policy victory for the Obama Administration.But on the more important matter of the Constitution,the decision was an 8-0 defeat for the Administration’s effort to upset the balance of power between the federal government and the states.In Arizona v.United States, the majority overturned three of the four contested provisions of Arizona’s controversial plan to have state and local police enforce federal immigration law.The Constitutional principles that Washington alone has the power to “establish a uniform Rule of Naturalization ”and that federal laws precede state laws are noncontroversial .Arizona had attempted to fashion state policies that ran parallel to the existing federal ones.Justice Anthony Kennedy, joined by Chief Justice John Roberts and the Court’s liberals, ruled that the state flew too close to the federal sun.On the overturned provisions the majority held the congress had deliberately “occupied the field” and Arizona had thus intruded on the federal’s privileged powers.However,the Justices said that Arizona police would be allowed to verify the legal status of people who come in contact with law enforcement.That’s because Congress has always envisioned joint federal-state immigration enforcement and explicitly encourages state officers to share information and cooperate with federal colleagues.Two of the three objecting Justice-Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas-agreed with this Constitutional logic but disagreed about which Arizona rules conflicted with the federal statute.The only major objection came from Justice Antonin Scalia,who offered an even more robust defense of state privileges going back to the alien and Sedition Acts.The 8-0 objection to President Obama turns on what Justice Samuel Alito describes in his objection as “a shocking assertion assertion of federal executive power”.The White House argued that Arizona’s laws conflicted with its enforcement priorities,even if state laws complied with federal statutes to the letter.In effect, the White House claimed that it could invalidate any otherwise legitimate state law that it disagrees with . Some powers do belong exclusively to the federal government, and control of citizenship and the borders is among them.But if Congress wanted to prevent states from using their own resources to check immigration status, it could.It never did so.The administration was in essence asserting that because it didn’t want to carry out Congress’s immigration wishes, no state should be allowed to do so either. Every Justice rightly rejected this remarkable claim. Three provisions of Arizona’s plan were overturned because they

outweighs that held by the states.

解析：考点分析：此题考查考生对文章细节信息的把握能力选项分析：根据题干中的关键词the White House, 定位在第六段。最后一句提到白宫声称它能够使任何它不同意的州法律不合法，也就是选项A。

[单选题]根据以下资料，回答{TSE}题。In the 2006 film version of The Devil Wears Prada, Miranda Priestly, played by Meryl Streep, scold her unattractive assistant for imagining that high fashion doesn’t affect her.Priestly explains how the deep blue color of the assistant’s sweater descended over the years from fashion shows to department stores and to the bargain bin in which the poor girl doubtless found her garment.This top-down conception of the fashion business couldn’t be more out of date or at odds with feverish world described in Overdressed, Elizabeth Cline’s three-year indictment of “fast fashion”.In the last decades or so, advances in technology have allowed mass-market labels such as Zara, H&M, and Uniqlo to react to trends more quickly and anticipate demand more precisely.Quckier turnrounds mean less wasted inventory, more frequent releases, and more profit.Those labels encourage style-conscious consumers to see clothes as disposal—— meant to last only a wash or two, although they don’t advertise that——and to renew their wardrobe every few weeks.By offering on-trend items at dirt-cheap prices, Cline argues, these brands have hijacked fashion cycles, shaking all industry long accustomed to a seasonal pace.The victims of this revolution, of course, are not limited to designers.For H&M to offer a 5.95 knit miniskirt in all its 2300-plus stores around the world, it must rely on low-wage, overseas labor, order in volumes that strain natural resources, and use massive amount of harmful chemicals.Overdressed is the fashion world’s answer to consumer activist bestsellers like Michael Pollan’s The Omnivore’s Dilemma.Mass-produced clothing, like fast food, fills a hunger and need, yet is non-durable, and wasteful,” Cline argues, Americans, she finds, buy roughly 20 billion garments a year——about 64 items per person——and no matter how much they give away, this excess leads to waste.Towards the end of Overdressed, Cline introduced her ideal, a Brooklyn woman named SKB, who, since 2008 has make all of her own clothes——and beautifully.But as Cline is the first to note, it took Beaumont decades to perfect her craft; her example, can’t be knocked off.Though several fast-fashion companies have made efforts to curb their impact on labor and the environment——including H&M, with its green Conscious Collection Line——Cline believes lasting-change can only be effected by the customer.She exhibits the idealism common to many advocates of sustainability, be it in food or in energy.Vanity is a constant; people will only start shopping more sustainably when they can’t afford to it.{TS}Priestly criticizes her assistant for her

insensitivity to fashion.