阅读下面的材料，按要求作文。 　　"学高为师，身正为范"是著名

【名词&注释】

爱岗敬业(cherishing the job devotionally)、计算机输入(computer input)、以身作则(set an example)、深入发展(further development)、不可或缺(indispensable)、每一个学生、《中小学教师职业道德规范》、传道授业解惑、品德高尚(lofty moral character)、有说服力(forcibility)

[多选题]阅读下面的材料，按要求作文。 　　"学高为师，身正为范"是著名教育家陶行知对教师的期望，也是他师范教育实践的指导思想。有人说："教师要教给学生知识，培养学生能力。所以，‘学高'太重要了。"也有人说："教师以育人为天职，是人类灵魂的工程师，所以，‘身正'最重要。"那么，你的看法呢？ 　　要求： 　　请联系实际，写一篇论说文，观点明确，分析具体，条理清楚，语言流畅。题目自拟，立意自定，不少于1000字。

A. 【参考范文】参考范文：谈"学高为师，身正为范" 随着社会的不断进步，社会对老师的要求也越来越高。那么到底什么样的老师才是一个合格的老师，一个优秀的老师呢？古今中外许多的教育学家对教师职业道德都有许多精辟的理论。但我认为始终都离不开"学高为师，身正为范"。 学高为师，指教师既要有精深的专业知识，又要有广博的科学文化知识，这样才可以成为真正传道授业解惑的教师。人们常说"要给学生一杯水，自己先要有一桶水"。随着社会的不断深入发展，信息的飞速传播，学生的成长不再简单，学生接受知识的渠道在拓宽。在这样的社会背景下，教师需要通过不断地学习去更新和提高自己的知识储备，而为自己去装满一桶水。苏霍姆林斯基说过提高教育素养的办法就是--读书、读书、再读书。"只有当教师的知识视野比学校教学大纲宽广得无可比拟的时候，教师才能成为教育过程的真正的能手、艺术家和诗人。"当代教师要以终身学习为目标，以身作则地成为学生终身学习的楷模和示范，用自己丰厚的知识储备去践行"学高为师"。 渊博的学识固然重要，因为这是成为老师的基本条件，但良好的道德品质也不可或缺。即教师不仅要学高，更要能够"身正"以为"世范"。人皆有模仿之本能，教师更是学生的不二榜样。按卢梭的说法，人能模仿这本是好的品性或习性，但如果不施加好的影响，则往往就趋向恶。所以作为教师，应该时刻反思自己能给学生们提供些什么值得模仿的东西？你期望受你影响的学生是一个有教养（有知识）的高尚的人，那你就要先造就自己。正如卢梭在《爱弥儿》这本书里所强调的"你要记住，在敢于担当培养一个人的任务（时候）以前，自己就必须要造就成一个人，自己就必须是一个值得推崇的模范"。"其身正，不令而行；其身不正，虽令不从。"要学生努力学习，教师自己就应学而不厌，手不释卷；要学生遵守纪律，自己就应模范的遵守，注意一言一行，而且做出榜样，才会更有说服力^{(forcibility)}。如果一个教师"人前浇花，人后偷瓜"，他就不配为人师表。常言道，只有你不断致力于自我教育，才能教育他人。 那么你可能要问了，到底是"学高"重要呢，还是"身正"重要呢？答案是两者都很重要。作为一名合格的教师，作为一名身兼"教书""育人"双重重任的教师，"学高"是教师传授知识的巨大库存，只有博学和慎思，才有可能带出才能杰出的学生；而"身正"是教师自身的品德修养，只有教师品德高尚^{(lofty moral character)}，学生才能德才兼备。如果一名教师只注重"学高"，那他对学生的教育无异于给计算机输入指令。他培养出来的要么是无情的高智商人才，要么是"越有知识越反动"的社会危险分子。但如果一名教师只注重"身正"而不修其学识，那也只能是"金玉其外败絮其中"的绣花枕头，不能真正培养学生成为一名对社会发展有利的高素质人才。 《荀子·大略》中说："国将兴，必贵师而重傅，贵师而重傅则法度存。"崛起的中国，需要教育的支撑；教育的未来，则需要更多教师具有学高身正的品德，成为学问的表率、行动的楷模。

查看答案&解析 查看所有试题

学习资料：

[单选题]"每一个学生都有被爱的权利，都应该得到充分的发展。"这就要求教师在工作中应该做到()。

A. 爱岗敬业
B. 关爱学生
C. 团结协作
D. 为人师表

[单选题]营业性歌厅、酒吧、网吧、未成年人不适宜进入的场所，应当设置明显的( )标志，不得允许未成年人进入。

A. 小学生禁止进入
B. 未成年人禁止进入
C. 衣冠不整者禁止进入
D. 未满16岁不得入内

[单选题]"入芝兰之室，久而不间其香"描述的是( )。

A. 适应现象
B. 听觉适应
C. 嗅觉刺激
D. 味觉刺激

[单选题]请阅读 Passage 2,完成1~5小题。 　　Passage 2 　　Everyone knows that English departments are in trouble,but you can't appreciate just how much trouble until you read the new report from the Modern Language Association.The report is about Ph.D.programs,which have been in decline since 2008.These programs have gotten both more difficult and less rewarding: today,it can take almost a decade to get a doctorate,anD.at the end of your program,you're unlikely to find a tenure-track job. 　　The core of the problem is,of course,the job market.The M.L.A.report estimates that only sixty per cent of newly-minted Ph.D.s will find tenure-track jobs after graduation.If anything,that's wildly optimistic: the M.L.A.got to that figure by comparing the number of tenure-track jobs on its job list (around six hundred) with the number of new graduates (about a thousand).But that leaves out the thousands of unemployed graduates from past years who are still job-hunting-not to mention the older professors who didn't receive tenure,and who now find themselves competing with their former students.In all likelihooD.the number of jobs per candidate is much smaller than the report suggests.That's why the mood is so dire—why even professors are starting to ask,in the committee's words,"Why maintain doctoral study in the modern languages and literatures-or the rest ofthe humanities-at all?" 　　Those trends,in turn,are part of an even larger story having to do with the expansion and transformation of American education after the Second World War.Essentially,colleges grew less elite and more vocational.Before the war,relatively few people went to college.Then,in the nineteen-fifties,the G.I.Bill anD.later,the Baby Boom pushed colleges to grow rapidly.When the boom endeD.colleges found themselves overextended and competing for students.By the midseventies,schools were creating new programs designed to attract a broader range of students-for instance,women and minorities. 　　Those reforms worked: as Nate Silver reported in the Times last summer,about twice as many people attend college per capita now as did forty years ago.But all that expansion changed colleges.In the past,they had catered to elite students who were happy to major in the traditional liberal arts.Now,to attract middle-class students,colleges had to offer more career-focused majors,in fields like business,communications,and health care.As a result,humanities departments have found 　　themselves drifting away from the center of the university.Today,they are often regarded as a kind of institutional luxury,paid for by dynamiC.cheap,and growing programs in,say,adult-education.These large demographic facts are contributing to today's job-market crisis: they're why,while education as a whole is growing,the humanities aren't. 　　Given all this,what can an English department do? The M.L.A.report contains a number of suggestions.Pride of place is given to the idea that grad school should be shorter: "Departments should design programs that can be completed in five years." That will probably require changing the dissertation from a draft of an academic book into something shorter and simpler.At the same time,graduate students are encouraged to "broaden" themselves: to "engage more deeply with technology" ; to pursue unusual and imaginative dissertation projects; to work in more than one discipline; to acquire teaching skills aimed at online and community-college students; and to take workshops on subjects,such as project management and grant writing,which might be of value outside of academiA.Graduate programs,the committee suggests,should accept the fact that many of their students will have non-tenureD.or even non-academiC.careers.They should keep track of what happens to their graduates,so that students who decide to leave academia have a non-academic alumni network to draw upon.

According to the author,which of the following is the key reason that leads to today's jobmarket crisis for Ph.D.students?

A. The expansion in college enrollments after the Second World War.
B. The shift of popularity from humanities majors to career-focused ones.
C. The rise in the number of women and minorities in graduate programs.
D. The lack of career-related guidance for college graduated in job-hunting.

本文链接：https://www.51bdks.net/show/zrnzpo.html