必典考网

请在第____处填上正确选项。

  • 下载次数:
  • 支持语言:
  • 100
  • 中文简体
  • 文件类型:
  • 支持平台:
  • pdf文档
  • PC/手机
  • 【名词&注释】

    科学发展观(scientific development view)、正确认识(correct understanding)、新世纪新阶段(new century and new stage)、集中体现(centralized reflection)、资本主义基本矛盾(basic contradiction of capitalism)、审时度势、“三三制”、经济基础与上层建筑(economic base and superstructure)、一个中心、两个基本点、顺应时代(this times)

  • [单选题]请在第____处填上正确选项。

  • 根据以下资料,回答下面的题目。The social sciences are flourishing.As of 2005,there were almost half a million professional social scientists from all fields in the world, working both inside and outside academia. According to the World Social Science Report 2010,the number of social-science students worldwide has swollen by about 11% every year since 2000.Yet this enormous resource in not contributing enough to today’s global challenges including climate change, security,sustainable development and health.(41)______Humanity has the necessary agro-technological tools to eradicate hunger , from genetically engineered crops to arificial fertilizers . Here , too, the problems are social: the organization and distribution of food, wealth and prosperity.(42)____This is a shame—the community should be grasping the opportunity to raise its influence in the real world. To paraphrase the great social scientist Joseph Schumpeter:there is no radical innovation without creative destruction .Today ,the social sciences are largely focused on disciplinary problems and internal scholarly debates,rather than on topics with external impact.Analyses reveal that the number of papers including the keywords “environmental changed” or “climate change” have increased rapidly since 2004,(43)____ When social scientists do tackle practical issues ,their scope is often local:Belgium is interested mainly in the effects of poverty on Belgium for example .And whether the community’s work contributes much to an overall accumulation of knowledge is doubtful. The problem is not necessarily the amount of available funding (44)____this is an adequate amount so long as it is aimed in the right direction. Social scientists who complain about a lack of funding should not expect more in today’s economic climate.The trick is to direct these funds better.The European Union Framework funding programs have long had a category specifically targeted at social scientists.This year,it was proposed that system be changed:Horizon 2020,a new program to be enacted in 2014,would not have such a category ,This has resulted in protests from social scientists.But the intention is not to neglect social science ; rather ,the complete opposite.(45)____That should createmore collaborative endeavors and help to develop projects aimed directly at solving global problems. 请在第____处填上正确选项。[A] It could be that we are evolving two communities of social scientists:one that is discipline-oriented and publishing in highly specialized journals,and one that is problem-oriented and publishing elsewhere,such as policy briefs.[B] However,the numbers are still small:in 2010,about 1,600 of the100,000 social-sciences papers published globally included one of theseKeywords.[C] the idea is to force social to integrate their work with other categories, including health and demographic change food security, marine research and the bio

  • A. F

  • 查看答案&解析 查看所有试题
  • 学习资料:
  • [单选题]针对蒋介石“内战、独裁、分裂”的阴谋,中国共产党明确提出了“和平、民主、团结,,三大口号,以代替过去提出的“抗战、团结、进步”三大口号。这一.口号来源于
  • A. 1945年《抗日战争胜利后的时局和我们的方针》
    B. 1945年《对目前时局的宣言》
    C. 1946年《中共关于目前时局及对策的指示》
    D. “双十协定”

  • [单选题]在当代中国。坚持发展是硬道理的本质要求是坚持科学发展.科学发展观是我国经济社会发展的重要指导方针。是发展中国特色社会主义必须坚持和贯彻的重大战略思想,是党必须长期坚持的指导思想。提出科学发展观的现实基础是
  • A. 当代世界的发展实践和发展理念
    B. 我国社会主义初级阶段的基本国情
    C. 新世纪新阶段的阶段性特征
    D. 社会主义建设正反两方面的历史经验

  • [多选题]“一个中心、两个基本点”是基本路线最主要的内容,是实现社会主义现代化奋斗目标的基本途径。以下对其内容概括正确的有
  • A. “以经济建设为中心,,回答了社会主义的根本任务问题,体现了解救生产力的本质要求
    B. “坚持四项基本原则’’回答了解放和发展生产力的政治保证问题,体现了社会主义基本制度的要求
    C. “坚持改革开放”回答了社会主义的发展动力和外部条件问题,体现了发展生产力的本质要求
    D. “一个中心、两个基本点,,是一个整体,揭示了中国特色往会主义的客观规律和发展道路

  • [多选题]抗日民主政府在工作人员分配上实行“三三制”原则。即共产党员、非党的左派进步分子和不左不右的中间派各占1/3。这是抗日民主政府在政权建设方面的一个重要内容-对“三三制”政权性质的表述,正确的有
  • A. 是以无产阶级为首的中国各革命阶级联合专政的政权
    B. 是共产党领导的抗日民族统一战线性质的政权
    C. 是一切赞成抗日又赞成民主的人们的政权
    D. 是几个革命阶级联合起来对于汉奸和反动派的民主专政

  • [多选题]在共产主义实现的历史必然性中就包含着无产阶级和先进人类对共产主义理想的追求,社会主义代替资本主义和最后实现共产主义的历史进程,离不开
  • A. 工人阶级及其政党的能动性
    B. 社会主义国家建设事业的推进
    C. 世界社会主义运动的发展
    D. 资本主义基本矛盾的推动

  • [单选题]The critics think that the new awards will most benefit
  • A. the profit-oriented scientists.
    B. the founders of the new awards.
    C. the achievement-based system.
    D. peer-review-led research.

  • [单选题]To which of the following would the author most probably agree?
  • A. The British welfare system indulges jobseekers’ laziness.
    B. Osborne’s reforms will reduce the risk of unemployment.
    C. The jobseekers’ allowance has met their actual needs.
    D. Unemployment benefits should not be made conditional.

  • [单选题]The White House claims that its power of enforcement
  • 根据以下资料,回答下面的题目。On a five to three vote, the Supreme Court knocked out much of Arizona’s immigration law Monday-a modest policy victory for the Obama Administration.But on the more important matter of the Constitution,the decision was an 8-0 defeat for the Administration’s effort to upset the balance of power between the federal government and the states.In Arizona v.United States, the majority overturned three of the four contested provisions of Arizona’s controversial plan to have state and local police enforce federal immigration law.The Constitutional principles that Washington alone has the power to “establish a uniform Rule of Naturalization ”and that federal laws precede state laws are noncontroversial .Arizona had attempted to fashion state policies that ran parallel to the existing federal ones.Justice Anthony Kennedy, joined by Chief Justice John Roberts and the Court’s liberals, ruled that the state flew too close to the federal sun.On the overturned provisions the majority held the congress had deliberately “occupied the field” and Arizona had thus intruded on the federal’s privileged powers.However,the Justices said that Arizona police would be allowed to verify the legal status of people who come in contact with law enforcement.That’s because Congress has always envisioned joint federal-state immigration enforcement and explicitly encourages state officers to share information and cooperate with federal colleagues.Two of the three objecting Justice-Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas-agreed with this Constitutional logic but disagreed about which Arizona rules conflicted with the federal statute.The only major objection came from Justice Antonin Scalia,who offered an even more robust defense of state privileges going back to the alien and Sedition Acts.The 8-0 objection to President Obama turns on what Justice Samuel Alito describes in his objection as “a shocking assertion assertion of federal executive power”.The White House argued that Arizona’s laws conflicted with its enforcement priorities,even if state laws complied with federal statutes to the letter.In effect, the White House claimed that it could invalidate any otherwise legitimate state law that it disagrees with . Some powers do belong exclusively to the federal government, and control of citizenship and the borders is among them.But if Congress wanted to prevent states from using their own resources to check immigration status, it could.It never did so.The administration was in essence asserting that because it didn’t want to carry out Congress’s immigration wishes, no state should be allowed to do so either. Every Justice rightly rejected this remarkable claim. Three provisions of Arizona’s plan were overturned because they

  • A. outweighs that held by the states.
    B. is dependent on the states’ support.
    C. is established by federal statutes.
    D. rarely goes against state laws.

  • [单选题]根据以下资料,回答{TSE}题。On a five to three vote, the Supreme Court knocked out much of Arizona’s immigration law Monday-a modest policy victory for the Obama Administration.But on the more important matter of the Constitution,the decision was an 8-0 defeat for the Administration’s effort to upset the balance of power between the federal government and the states.In Arizona v.United States, the majority overturned three of the four contested provisions of Arizona’s controversial plan to have state and local police enforce federal immigration law.The Constitutional principles that Washington alone has the power to “establish a uniform Rule of Naturalization ”and that federal laws precede state laws are noncontroversial .Arizona had attempted to fashion state policies that ran parallel to the existing federal ones.Justice Anthony Kennedy, joined by Chief Justice John Roberts and the Court’s liberals, ruled that the state flew too close to the federal sun.On the overturned provisions the majority held the congress had deliberately “occupied the field” and Arizona had thus intruded on the federal’s privileged powers.However,the Justices said that Arizona police would be allowed to verify the legal status of people who come in contact with law enforcement.That’s because Congress has always envisioned joint federal-state immigration enforcement and explicitly encourages state officers to share information and cooperate with federal colleagues.Two of the three objecting Justice-Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas-agreed with this Constitutional logic but disagreed about which Arizona rules conflicted with the federal statute.The only major objection came from Justice Antonin Scalia,who offered an even more robust defense of state privileges going back to the alien and Sedition Acts.The 8-0 objection to President Obama turns on what Justice Samuel Alito describes in his objection as “a shocking assertion assertion of federal executive power”.The White House argued that Arizona’s laws conflicted with its enforcement priorities,even if state laws complied with federal statutes to the letter.In effect, the White House claimed that it could invalidate any otherwise legitimate state law that it disagrees with . Some powers do belong exclusively to the federal government, and control of citizenship and the borders is among them.But if Congress wanted to prevent states from using their own resources to check immigration status, it could.It never did so.The administration was in essence asserting that because it didn’t want to carry out Congress’s immigration wishes, no state should be allowed to do so either. Every Justice rightly rejected this remarkable claim. {TS}Three provisions of Arizona’s plan were overturned because they
  • A. deprived the federal police of Constitutional powers.
    B. disturbed the power balance between different states.
    C. overstepped the authority of federal immigration law.
    D. contradicted both the federal and state policies.

  • 本文链接:https://www.51bdks.net/show/w55qxn.html
  • 推荐阅读

    @2019-2025 必典考网 www.51bdks.net 蜀ICP备2021000628号 川公网安备 51012202001360号