"并非只有上大学才能成才。"与这一判断等值的是( )。

【名词&注释】

基础教育(basic education)、地市级、县级教育行政部门、省级教育行政部门(educational administration at provincia ...)、上大学(getting in to university)

[单选题]"并非只有上大学^{(getting in to university)}才能成才。"与这一判断等值的是( )。

A. 不上大学^{(getting in to university)}就不能成才
B. 不上大学^{(getting in to university)}但也能成才
C. 如果上大学^{(getting in to university)}，就能成才
D. 并非如果不成才就是没上大学^{(getting in to university)}

查看答案&解析 查看所有试题

学习资料：

[单选题]地方课程是指( )。

A. 由省级教育行政部门开发的课程
B. 由地市级教育行政部门开发课程
C. 由县级教育行政部门开发的课程
D. 由学校开发的课程

[多选题]学校开展心理健康教育的基本途径。

A. (1)开设心理健康教育相关课程；(2)开设心理辅导活动课；(3)在学科教学中渗透心理健康教育的内容；(4)结合班级、团队活动开展心理健康教育；(5)个别心理辅导或咨询；(6)小组心理辅导。

[单选题]德育过程与品德形成过程的关系是( )。

A. 二者之间是一致的，可以等同
B. 教育与发展的关系
C. 相互促进的关系
D. 相互包容的关系

[单选题]课堂气氛的类型主要包括( )。①积极的课堂气氛②消极的课堂气氛⑧一般型课堂气氛④对抗的课堂气氛

A. ①②
B. ①②④
C. ③④
D. ①②③④

[单选题]What purpose does NOT post-listening activities serve?

A. Helping students relate the text with their personal experience.
B. Offering students the opportunities of extending other language skills.
C. Practicing students' ability of matching the pre-listening predictions with contents of the text.
D. Giving the answer directly to students and not to explain.

[单选题] In the early 20th century, few things were more appealing than the promise of scientific knowledge. In a world struggling with rapid industrialization, science and technology seemed to offer solutions to almost every problem. Newly created state colleges and universities devoted themselves almost entirely to scientific, technological, and engineering fields. Many Americans came to believe that scientific certainty could not only solve scientific problems, but also reform politics, government, and business. Two world wars and a Great Depression rocked the confidence of many people that scientific expertise alone could create a prosperous and ordered world. After World War Ⅱ, the academic world turned with new enthusiasm to humanistic studies, which seemed to many scholars the best way to ensure the survival of democracy. American scholars fanned out across much of the world-with support from the Ford Foundation, the Fulbright program, etc.-to promote the teaching of literature and the arts in an effort to make the case for democratic freedoms. In the America of our own time, the great educational challenge has become an effort. to strengthen the teaching of what is now known as the STEM disciplines (science, technology, engineering, and math). There is considerable and justified concern that the United States is falling behind much of the rest of the developed world in these essential disciplines. India, China, Japan, and other regions seem to be seizing technological leadership. At the same time, perhaps inevitably, the humanities-while still popular in elite colleges and universities-have experienced a significant decline. Humanistic disciplines are seriously underfunded, not just by the government and the foundations but by academic institutions themselves. Humanists are usually among the lowest-paid faculty members at most institutions and are often lightly regarded because they do not generate grant income and because they provide no obvious credentials (资质) for most nonacademic careers. Undoubtedly American education should train more scientists and engineers. Much of the concern among politicians about the state of American universities today is focused on the absence of "real world" education-which means preparation for professional and scientific careers. But the idea that institutions or their students must decide between humanities and science is false. Our society could not survive without scientific and technological knowledge. But we would be equally impoverished without humanistic knowledge as well. Science and technology teach us what we can do. Humanistic thinking helps us understand what we should do. It is almost impossible to imagine our society without thinking of the extraordinary achievements of scientists and engineers in building our complicated world. But try to imagine our world as well without the remarkable works that have defined our culture and values. We have always needed, and we still need, both.

Why are humanists regarded lightly today?

A. Their income is too high.
B. They are short of scientific knowledge.
C. They benefit little in people's income and nonacademic job hunting.
D. Humanistic disciplines are seriously underfunded.

本文链接：https://www.51bdks.net/show/vz53dl.html