被称为"范跑跑"的中学教师范美忠认为"教师只是一种谋生的手段"，

【名词&注释】

发现问题、中学教师(middle school teachers)、提出问题(posing problems)、伤亡人数(fatalities)、有关规定(related regulations)、建设者和接班人(builders and successors)、社会主义事业建设者(builders of socialist cause)、"教书育人"、《中小学教师职业道德规范》、社会主义物质文明和精神文明(socialist material and spiritual civili ...)

[单选题]被称为"范跑跑"的中学教师范美忠认为"教师只是一种谋生的手段"，却"被认为带上了神圣的光环"。范美忠的言论与下面的那一条职业道德规范相违背？()。

A. 终身学习
B. 教书育人
C. 团结协作
D. 为人师表

查看答案&解析 查看所有试题

学习资料：

[单选题]《中华人民共和国教育法》最重要立法目的是( )。

A. 为了发展教育事业，提高全民族的素质
B. 发展社会主义的教育事业
C. 普及全社会尊重教师的意识
D. 规范我国教育事业建设，为我国培养社会主义事业建设者^{(builders of socialist cause)}和接班人

[单选题]以下说法正确的是( )。

A. 商店老板目测陈某已经成年，将烟卖给了他
B. 公园应无条件向未成年免费开放
C. 对无其他监护人的孤儿应由民政部门设立的儿童福利机构收留抚养
D. 《中国人民共和国未成年人保护法》于1999年11月1日起施行

[单选题]把握问题的本质和关键信息，摒弃无关因素，并在头脑中形成有关问题的初步印象，即形成问题的表征的过程，就是( )。

A. 发现问题
B. 提出问题
C. 明确问题
D. 分解问题

[单选题]下列属于内部动机的是( )。

A. 学好英语可以得到小红花
B. 学好英语可以得到老师表扬
C. 喜欢听纯正的英语
D. 学好英语将来可以出国

[单选题]学习策略一般包括认知策略、元认知策略和( )。

A. 记忆策略
B. 资源管理策略
C. 思维策略
D. 方法策略

[单选题] After the violent earthquake that shook Los Angeles in 1994, earthquake scientists had good news to report: The damage and death toll could have been much worse. More than 60 people died in this earthquake. By comparison, an earthquake of similar intensity that shook America in 1988 claimed 25,000 victims. Injuries and deaths were relatively less in Los Angeles because the quake occurred at 4:31 am on a holiday, when traffic was light on the city's highways. In addition, changes made to the construction codes in Los Angeles during the last 20 years have strengthened the city's buildings and highways, making them more resistant to quakes. Despite the good news, civil engineers aren't resting on their successes. Pinned to their drawing boards are blueprints for improved quake resistant buildings. The new designs should offer even greater security to cities where earthquakes often take place. In the past, making structures quake-resistant meant firm yet flexible materials, such as steel and wood, that bend without breaking. Later, people tried to lift a building off its foundation, and insert rubber and steel between the building and its foundation to reduce the impact of ground vibrations, The most recent designs give buildings brains as well as concrete and steel supports. Called smart buildings, the structures respond like living organisms to an earthquake's vibrations. When the ground shakes and the building tips forward, the computer would force the building to shift in the opposite direction. The new smart structures could be very expensive to build. However, they would save many lives and would be less likely to be damaged during earthquakes.

The author's main purpose in writing the Passage is to ________.

A. compare the consequences of the earthquakes that occurred in the U.S.
B. encourage civil engineers to make more extensive use of computers
C. outline the history of the development of quake-resistant building materials
D. report new developments in constructing quake-resistant buildings

[单选题]请阅读 Passage 2,完成 1~5小题。 　　Passage 2 　　Scientists have been surprised at how deeply culture-the language we speak,the values we absorb-shapes the brain,and are rethinking findings derived from studies of Westerners.To take one recent example,a region behind the forehead called the medial prefrontal cortex supposedly represents the self: it is active when we ( "we" being the Americans in the study) think of our own identity and traits.But with Chinese volunteers,the results were strikingly different.The "me" circuit hummed not only when they thought whether a particular adjective described themselves,but also when they considered whether it described their mother.The Westerners showed no such overlap between self and mom.Depending whether one lives in a culture that views the self as autonomous and unique or as connected to and part of a larger whole,this neural circuit takes on quite different functions. 　　"Cultural neuroscience" ,as this new field is calleD.is about discovering such differences.Some of the findings,as with the "me/mom" circuit,buttress longstanding notions of cultural differences.For instance,it is a cultural cliche that Westerners focus on individual objects while East Asians pay attention to context and background (another manifestation of the individualism-collectivism split).Sure enough,when shown complex,busy scenes,Asian-Americans and non-Asian-Americans recruited different brain regions.The Asians showed more activity in areas that process figure-ground relations-holistic context-while the Americans showed more activity in regions that recognize objects. 　　Psychologist Nalini Ambady of Tufts found something similar when she and colleagues showed drawings of people in a submissive pose (head down,shoulders hunched) or a dominant one (arms crosseD.face forward) to Japanese and Americans.The brain's dopamine-fueled reward circuit became most active at the sight of the stance-dominant for Americans,submissive for Japanese-that each volunteer's culture most values,they reported in 2009.This raises an obvious chicken-and-egg question,but the smart money is on culture shaping the brain,not vice versa.Cultural neuroscience wouldn't be making waves if it found neurobiological bases only for well-known cultural differences.It is also uncovering the unexpected.For instance,a 2006 study found that native Chinese speakers use a different region of the brain to do simple arithmetic (3 + 4) or decide which number is larger than native English speakers do,even though both use Arabic numerals.The Chinese use the circuits that process visual and spatial information and plan movements (the latter may be related to the use of the abacus).But English speakers use language circuits.It is as if the West conceives numbers as just words,but the East imbues them with symboliC.spatial freight.(Insert cliche about Asian math geniuses.) "One would think that neural processes involvng basic mathematical computations are universal," says Ambady,but they "seem to be culture-specific". 　　Not to be the skunk at this party,but I thunk it's important to ask whether neuroscience reveals anything more than we already know from,say,anthropology.For instance,it's well known that East Asian cultures prize the collective over the individual,and that Americans do the opposite.Does identifying brain correlates of those values offer any extra insight? After all,it's not as if anyone thought those values are the result of something in the liver. 　　Ambady thinks cultural neuro-science does advance understanding.Take the me/mom finding,which,she argues,"attests to the strength of the overlap between self and people close to you in collectivistic cultures and the separation in individualistic cultures.It is important to push the analysis to the level of the brain." Especially when it shows how fundamental cultural differences are-so fundamental,perhaps,that "universal" notions such as human rights,democracy,and the like may be no such thing.

Which of the following can be inferred from the passage?

A. Neural processes are likely to be culturally neutral.
B. The brain is believed to be influenced by different cultures.
C. Westerners focus on individualism while East Asians on collectivism.
D. Neuroscience reveals nothing more than we know from anthropology.

本文链接：https://www.51bdks.net/show/93r50w.html