必典考网

2022学历考试考研实战模拟每日一练(08月18日)

来源: 必典考网    发布:2022-08-18     [手机版]    
  • 下载次数:
  • 支持语言:
  • 593次
  • 中文简体
  • 文件类型:
  • 支持平台:
  • pdf文档
  • PC/手机

导读

必典考网发布2022学历考试考研实战模拟每日一练(08月18日),更多考研的每日一练请访问必典考网学历考试频道。

1. [单选题]某资本家投资100万元,每次投资所获得的利润为25万元,假定其资本有机构成为4:1,那么该资本家每次投资所实现的剩余价值率为(  )

A. 100%
B. 75%
C. 50%
D. 125%


2. [单选题]爱迪生在发明电灯之前做了两千多实验,有个年轻的记者曾经问他为什么遭遇这么多次失败。爱迪生回答:“我一次都没有失败。我发明了电灯。这只是一段经历了两千步的历程。”爱迪生之所以说“我一次都没有失败”,是因为他把每一次实验都看作

A. 认识中所获得的相对真理(relative truth)
B. 整个实践过程中的一部分
C. 对事物规律的正确反映
D. 实践中(practice)可以忽略不计的偶然挫折


3. [单选题]正确答案是_______.

A. F


4. [单选题]正确答案是_______.

A. D


5. [单选题]The White House claims that its power of enforcement

根据以下资料,回答下面的题目。On a five to three vote, the Supreme Court knocked out much of Arizona’s immigration law Monday-a modest policy victory for the Obama Administration.But on the more important matter of the Constitution,the decision was an 8-0 defeat for the Administration’s effort to upset the balance of power between the federal government and the states.In Arizona v.United States, the majority overturned three of the four contested provisions of Arizona’s controversial plan to have state and local police enforce federal immigration law.The Constitutional principles that Washington alone has the power to “establish a uniform Rule of Naturalization ”and that federal laws precede state laws are noncontroversial .Arizona had attempted to fashion state policies that ran parallel to the existing federal ones.Justice Anthony Kennedy, joined by Chief Justice John Roberts and the Court’s liberals, ruled that the state flew too close to the federal sun.On the overturned provisions the majority held the congress had deliberately “occupied the field” and Arizona had thus intruded on the federal’s privileged powers.However,the Justices said that Arizona police would be allowed to verify the legal status of people who come in contact with law enforcement.That’s because Congress has always envisioned joint federal-state immigration enforcement and explicitly encourages state officers to share information and cooperate with federal colleagues.Two of the three objecting Justice-Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas-agreed with this Constitutional logic but disagreed about which Arizona rules conflicted with the federal statute.The only major objection came from Justice Antonin Scalia,who offered an even more robust defense of state privileges going back to the alien and Sedition Acts.The 8-0 objection to President Obama turns on what Justice Samuel Alito describes in his objection as “a shocking assertion assertion of federal executive power”.The White House argued that Arizona’s laws conflicted with its enforcement priorities,even if state laws complied with federal statutes to the letter.In effect, the White House claimed that it could invalidate any otherwise legitimate state law that it disagrees with . Some powers do belong exclusively to the federal government, and control of citizenship and the borders is among them.But if Congress wanted to prevent states from using their own resources to check immigration status, it could.It never did so.The administration was in essence asserting that because it didn’t want to carry out Congress’s immigration wishes, no state should be allowed to do so either. Every Justice rightly rejected this remarkable claim. Three provisions of Arizona’s plan were overturned because they

A. outweighs that held by the states.
B. is dependent on the states’ support.
C. is established by federal statutes.
D. rarely goes against state laws.


  • 查看答案&解析 查看所有试题

  • 本文链接:https://www.51bdks.net/show/70vykk.html

    @2019-2025 必典考网 www.51bdks.net 蜀ICP备2021000628号 川公网安备 51012202001360号